You may know your EBITDA.
You may even know your adjusted EBITDA.
But here’s the question that matters when you’re preparing to sell:
Will the buyer believe it?
Because once sophisticated buyers, private equity firms, lenders, and their financial teams begin digging into your numbers, they are not simply asking how profitable your company appears to be.
They want to know how much of that profitability is real, recurring, sustainable, and transferable to them after the acquisition.
That is where a Quality of Earnings analysis can become very important.
And if you are thinking about selling your business in the next one to three years, this is something you should understand before a buyer starts asking the questions.
Your EBITDA Is a Starting Point, Not the Finish Line
In Exit Rich, I talk extensively about the importance of normalizing your finances.
Why?
Because the profit shown on your tax return or P&L does not always tell the full story.
Business owners frequently run personal expenses through the company. They may also have legitimate one-time or nonrecurring expenses that reduce reported profitability.
When we normalize the financials, we go through the P&L and tax returns line by line to identify legitimate adjustments and determine the company’s true adjusted EBITDA.
That process can uncover substantial value.
But there is another side to the equation.
You can claim an add-back. A buyer does not have to accept it.
And that’s where many owners can get surprised.
What Is a Quality of Earnings Report?
A Quality of Earnings, or QoE, analysis is commonly used in M&A due diligence to examine the underlying earnings of a company.
Instead of simply accepting the seller’s EBITDA calculation, the buyer’s financial advisors may examine the historical numbers to determine what the company’s normalized and maintainable earnings really are.
That can include examining historical financial performance, normalization adjustments, working capital requirements, unusual transactions, margins, and other factors that could affect valuation or deal terms.
Think of it this way:
Your financial statements tell a buyer what happened.
A Quality of Earnings analysis helps them decide how much of it they believe will continue.
That distinction matters.
Especially when your purchase price is based on a multiple of EBITDA.
The Add-Back Test
One of the biggest areas of potential disagreement is add-backs.
In Exit Rich, I explain that personal and nonrecurring expenses can potentially be added back when determining adjusted EBITDA.
Examples can include certain owner-related expenses and legitimate one-time expenses such as moving costs, renovations, a software overhaul, dispute-related legal fees, or disaster recovery costs.
But there is a rule I want every owner to remember:
If you can’t prove the add-back, don’t expect the buyer to give you credit for it.
In fact, Exit Rich specifically stresses that we do not add back personal or nonrecurring expenses if the seller cannot substantiate them. Buyers and their advisors may go expense by expense during due diligence to determine whether those adjustments are legitimate.
Suppose you tell a buyer:
“We spent $200,000 last year on something that will never happen again, so you should add that $200,000 back to EBITDA.”
The buyer’s next questions may be:
Why won’t it happen again?
Was it truly extraordinary?
Is there documentation?
Did that expense actually support ongoing revenue?
Will the buyer have to incur a similar expense after closing?
Those questions can determine whether that $200,000 survives due diligence.
And when your company is being valued at a multiple of EBITDA, a disputed adjustment can have an impact far beyond the adjustment itself.
Buyers Want Earnings They Can Defend
This is one of the reasons the Profits P in the ST 6 P Method® matters so much.
But Profits does not simply mean:
“Make more money.”
You need clean financial reporting.
You need accurate books.
You need to understand your margins.
You need to know your KPIs.
You need to understand cash flow.
And you need financial records capable of standing up to scrutiny.
In Exit Rich, I recommend that owners know their numbers, ensure the general ledger is accurate, use checks and balances, monitor cash flow, benchmark industry margins, review KPIs, and clean up their financial house.
Those are not merely accounting exercises.
They are value-building exercises.
Because a sophisticated buyer is not buying your explanation.
They are buying the business behind the numbers.
The Most Dangerous EBITDA Is EBITDA You Can’t Explain
Imagine two companies.
Both report $3 million in adjusted EBITDA.
Company A has organized books, clear monthly reporting, documented adjustments, reconciled bank statements, predictable margins, and financial records that tell one consistent story.
Company B has the same claimed EBITDA, but the owner has personal expenses mixed throughout the P&L, aggressive add-backs, unexplained changes between years, incomplete documentation, and a bookkeeper scrambling to answer questions after due diligence begins.
Which company feels less risky to a buyer?
Which company gives a buyer more confidence?
Which seller is likely to have an easier negotiation?
This is where many owners misunderstand valuation.
The number matters. But the credibility of the number matters too.
Deloitte notes that sellers seeking support for EBITDA adjustments need a clear financial narrative and substantiation, because buyer confidence in those adjustments can affect how they are treated in a transaction.
That is completely consistent with the methodology in Exit Rich.
The more organized your information is, and the easier your numbers are to verify, the easier due diligence becomes.
Assume the Buyer Will Verify Everything
A serious buyer may not stop with your P&L.
In Exit Rich, we explain that buyers may want several years of tax returns, P&Ls, balance sheets, cash-flow statements, accounts receivable and payable reports, projections, debt schedules, bank statements, and other supporting information.
They may compare your tax returns with your financial statements.
They may examine bank activity.
Their accountants may attempt to trace transactions back to invoices or receipts.
The book makes another critical point: poor record keeping can scare buyers, create concerns about potential liabilities, result in holdbacks or reserves, influence deal structure, or otherwise reduce the attractiveness of the transaction.
That means you do not want to start cleaning up your finances when the buyer sends the diligence request.
By then, the clock is already running.
Three Questions to Ask Before You Go to Market
If an exit is potentially within your next one to three years, start with these three questions:
- Can we substantiate every material add-back in our adjusted EBITDA?
- Can an outside financial professional reconcile our financial statements, tax returns, and supporting records without finding major inconsistencies?
- Are the earnings we’re presenting genuinely repeatable under new ownership?
That third question is especially important.
A buyer is not purchasing your past.
They are purchasing what they believe the business can produce after you leave.
So if your profits depend on you personally making every major sale, maintaining every customer relationship, controlling pricing, solving every operational problem, or doing work no replacement has been trained to perform, you may have a much bigger issue than accounting.
Now the other P’s become involved.
People: Is there a management team capable of maintaining performance?
Product: Are your products and services still in a thriving market?
Process: Are your systems documented and repeatable?
Proprietary: What valuable assets differentiate the company?
Patrons: Is revenue diversified, recurring, and transferable?
Profits: Are your earnings healthy, documented, and sustainable?
That is why I have always said that weakness in profits is often a symptom of weaknesses elsewhere in the business.
Don’t Wait for the Buyer to Tell You What Your Numbers Really Say
One of the worst times to discover a financial weakness is after you have received an attractive offer.
Now the buyer has leverage.
They have invested time and money in due diligence.
You are emotionally invested in closing.
And suddenly your $3 million adjusted EBITDA is being challenged.
An add-back gets rejected.
Another expense is determined to be recurring.
A working-capital issue surfaces.
The buyer becomes more conservative.
And the conversation changes from:
“How much will you pay?”
to:
“How much are you going to retrade?”
That is why exit planning needs to start long before the exit.
Your GPS Exit Model should tell you your destination, current value, timeframe, target buyers, buyer criteria, and KPIs.
Then you use that runway to close the value gap.
If your destination requires a certain EBITDA to achieve the valuation you want, don’t simply set an EBITDA target.
Build an EBITDA number a buyer can verify, believe, and ultimately pay for.
Put Your Financials Through Due Diligence Before a Buyer Does
If I were planning to sell a business in the next few years, I would not wait for a buyer’s Quality of Earnings analysis to discover the problems.
I would conduct my own financial readiness review first.
Go line by line.
Identify the add-backs.
Document them.
Clean up the bookkeeping.
Reconcile the records.
Review recurring versus nonrecurring revenue and expenses.
Understand working capital.
Know your margins.
Know your KPIs.
And make sure your financial statements tell the same story you plan to tell the buyer.
Because when it comes time to sell, you don’t want to defend your EBITDA with opinions.
You want to prove it with evidence.
And that’s how you protect value before you ever get to the closing table.
CTA
Do you know what your business is worth today, and what a sophisticated buyer would actually pay for it?
If you’re considering an exit within the next one to three years, now is the time to identify the gap between your current value and your desired exit.
Start with a professional business valuation and an Exit Rich readiness assessment before the buyer starts doing the evaluating for you.






Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.